Implementation of a Follow-Up System for Pediatric Sepsis Survivors in a Large Academic Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Survivors of pediatric sepsis often develop new morbidities and deterioration in quality of life after sepsis, leading to a need for improved follow-up for children who survive sepsis. Objective: To implement a follow-up system for pediatric sepsis survivors in a pediatric health system. Methods: We performed a retrospective case series of patients treated for sepsis from October 2018 through October 2019 in a pediatric intensive care unit in a quaternary children's hospital, and describe implementation of a follow-up system for sepsis survivors. Program planning started in 2017 with multidisciplinary meetings including physical, occupational, and speech therapists, teachers, neuropsychologists, and coordinators from other survivorship programs (neonatology, stroke, and oncology). In 2018, a workshop was held to consult with local and national experts. The Pediatric Sepsis Survivorship Program launched in October 2018 led by a nurse coordinator who met with families to educate about sepsis and offer post-discharge follow-up. Patients with high pre-existing medical complexity or established subspecialty care were referred for follow-up through existing care coordination or subspecialty services plus guidance to monitor for post-sepsis morbidity. For patients with low-moderate medical complexity, the nurse coordinator administered a telephone-based health-assessment 2-3 months after discharge to screen for new physical or psychosocial morbidity. Patients flagged with concerns were referred to their primary physician and/or to expedited neuropsychological evaluation to utilize existing medical services. Results: Of 80 sepsis patients, 10 died, 20 were referred to care coordination by the program, and 13 had subspecialty follow-up. Five patients were followed in different health systems, four were adults not appropriate for existing follow-up programs, four remained hospitalized, and four were missed due to short stay or unavailable caregivers. The remaining 20 patients were scheduled for follow-up with the Pediatric Sepsis Program. Nine patients completed the telephone assessment. Four patients were receiving new physical or occupational therapy, and one patient was referred for neuropsychology evaluation due to new difficulties with attention, behavior, and completion of school tasks. Conclusions: Implementation of an efficient, low-cost pediatric sepsis survivorship program was successful by utilizing existing systems of care, when available, and filling a follow-up gap in screening for select patients.

Optimizing the multidisciplinary team to enhance care coordination across the continuum for children with medical complexity.

The number of individual patients needing the support of complex care coordination to help manage chronic illness and functional disability and to negotiate systemic barriers to care continues to grow. Children with medical complexity (CMC) require a multidisciplinary team approach to address their complex health care needs.  CMC may have multiple health conditions affecting numerous body systems, increased use of the health care system, and technology dependence.  A cohesive team approach to care for CMC is necessary to ensure that there are clearly defined roles for each member of the care team and the individualized plan of care is implemented with the unique needs of the patient and family at the center of the care. This article will outline the roles of the essential providers that support these children.

A Tertiary Care-based Complex Care Program: Improving Care for Children With Medical Complexity.

OBJECTIVE: Children with medical complexity (CMC) have significant health care costs, but they also experience substantial unmet health care needs, hospitalizations, and medical errors. Their parents often report psychosocial stressors and poor care satisfaction. Complex care programs can improve the care for CMC. At our tertiary care institution, we developed a consultative complex care program to improve the quality and cost of care for CMC and to improve the experience of care for patients and families. METHODS: To address the needs of CMC at our institution, we developed the Compass Care Program, a consultative complex care program across inpatient and outpatient settings. Utilization data [hospital admissions per patient month; length of stay per admission; hospital days per patient month; emergency department (ED) visits per patient month; and institutional charges per patient month] and caregiver satisfaction data (obtained via paper survey at outpatient visits) were tracked over the period of participation in the program and compared preenrollment and postenrollment for program participants. RESULTS: Participants had significant decreases in hospital admissions per patient month, length of stay per admission, hospital days per patient month, and charges per patient month following enrollment (P<0.01) without a tandem increase in readmissions within 7 days of discharge. There was no statistically significant difference in ED visits. Caregiver satisfaction scores improved in all domains. CONCLUSION: Participation in a consultative complex care program can improve utilization patterns and cost of care for CMC, as well as experience of care for patients and families.